JONES v. FLORIDA, 394 U.S. 720 (1969)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
JONES v. FLORIDA, 394 U.S. 720 (1969) 394 U.S. 720JONES v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT. No. 807, Misc.
Decided April 21, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 205 So. 2d 675, vacated and remanded.
Phillip A. Hubbart for petitioner.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Harold Mendelow, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, and Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT. No. 807, Misc.
Decided April 21, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 205 So. 2d 675, vacated and remanded. Phillip A. Hubbart for petitioner. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Harold Mendelow, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, and Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293. Page 394 U.S. 720, 721
U.S. Supreme Court
JONES v. FLORIDA, 394 U.S. 720 (1969) 394 U.S. 720 JONES v. FLORIDA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT
COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT. No. 807, Misc.
Decided April 21, 1969.
Certiorari granted; 205 So. 2d 675, vacated and remanded. Phillip A. Hubbart for petitioner. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Harold Mendelow, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, and Roberts v. Russell, 392 U.S. 293. Page 394 U.S. 720, 721
Search This Case
