SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 534 (1969)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 534 (1969) 393 U.S. 534SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED
STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 878.
Decided February 24, 1969.
Affirmed.
Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross, and David V. Kahn for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 878.
Decided February 24, 1969.
Affirmed. Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross, and David V. Kahn for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 393 U.S. 534, 535
U.S. Supreme Court
SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 534 (1969) 393 U.S. 534 SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 878.
Decided February 24, 1969.
Affirmed. Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross, and David V. Kahn for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 393 U.S. 534, 535
Search This Case
