SAMSON MARKET CO., INC. v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 11 (1968)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
SAMSON MARKET CO., INC. v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 11 (1968) 393 U.S. 11SAMSON MARKET CO., INC. v.
KIRBY, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF
CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 326.
Decided October 14, 1968.
261 Cal. App. 2d 577, 68 Cal. Rptr. 130, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Jacques Leslie and Lawrence Teplin for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Kenneth Scholtz, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Opinions
KIRBY, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 326.
Decided October 14, 1968.
261 Cal. App. 2d 577, 68 Cal. Rptr. 130, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Jacques Leslie and Lawrence Teplin for appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Kenneth Scholtz, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 393 U.S. 11, 12
U.S. Supreme Court
SAMSON MARKET CO., INC. v. KIRBY, 393 U.S. 11 (1968) 393 U.S. 11 SAMSON MARKET CO., INC. v.KIRBY, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 326.
Decided October 14, 1968.
261 Cal. App. 2d 577, 68 Cal. Rptr. 130, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Jacques Leslie and Lawrence Teplin for appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Kenneth Scholtz, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 393 U.S. 11, 12
Search This Case
