GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968) 392 U.S. 643 GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1261.
Decided June 17, 1968.
21 N.Y.2d 152, 234 N.E.2d 194, appeal dismissed.
Robert E. Goldman and Stephen R. Wiener for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.
U.S. Supreme Court
RHODES v. COOK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968) 392 U.S. 643 RHODES v. COOK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1283.
Decided June 17, 1968.
72 Wash. 2d 436, 433 P.2d 677, appeal dismissed.
E. A. Niemeier, Frank A. Bauman, John K. Mallory, Jr., and R. Michael Duncan for appellant.
John F. Wilson for appellee.
Harry R. Calbom, Jr., for Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
U.S. Supreme Court
GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968) 392 U.S. 643 GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1261.
Decided June 17, 1968.
21 N.Y.2d 152, 234 N.E.2d 194, appeal dismissed.
Robert E. Goldman and Stephen R. Wiener for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.
U.S. Supreme Court
RHODES v. COOK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968) 392 U.S. 643 RHODES v. COOK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1283.
Decided June 17, 1968.
72 Wash. 2d 436, 433 P.2d 677, appeal dismissed.
E. A. Niemeier, Frank A. Bauman, John K. Mallory, Jr., and R. Michael Duncan for appellant.
John F. Wilson for appellee.
Harry R. Calbom, Jr., for Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
Page 392 U.S. 643, 644
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
