ROSS v. CALIFORNIA, 391 U.S. 470 (1968)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ROSS v. CALIFORNIA, 391 U.S. 470 (1968) 391 U.S. 470ROSS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
CALIFORNIA.
No. 798, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 67 Cal. 2d 64, 429 P.2d 606, reversed.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter R. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, and Anderson v. Nelson, 390 U.S. 523.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 798, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 67 Cal. 2d 64, 429 P.2d 606, reversed. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter R. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, and Anderson v. Nelson, 390 U.S. 523. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. Page 391 U.S. 470, 471
U.S. Supreme Court
ROSS v. CALIFORNIA, 391 U.S. 470 (1968) 391 U.S. 470 ROSS v. CALIFORNIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 798, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 67 Cal. 2d 64, 429 P.2d 606, reversed. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter R. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, and Anderson v. Nelson, 390 U.S. 523. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. Page 391 U.S. 470, 471
Search This Case
