ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENN. EX REL. CANALE, 389 U.S. 578 (1968)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENN. EX REL. CANALE, 389 U.S. 578 (1968) 389 U.S. 578ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v.
TENNESSEE EX REL. CANALE, DISTRICT
ATTORNEY GENERAL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE. No. 679.
Decided January 15, 1968.
___ Tenn. ___, 414 S.W.2d 638, reversed.
Longstreet Heiskell for appellant.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE would affirm.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.
Opinions
ATTORNEY GENERAL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE. No. 679.
Decided January 15, 1968.
___ Tenn. ___, 414 S.W.2d 638, reversed. Longstreet Heiskell for appellant. George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767. THE CHIEF JUSTICE would affirm. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455. Page 389 U.S. 578, 579
U.S. Supreme Court
ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENN. EX REL. CANALE, 389 U.S. 578 (1968) 389 U.S. 578 ROBERT-ARTHUR MANAGEMENT CORP. v. TENNESSEE EX REL. CANALE, DISTRICTATTORNEY GENERAL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE. No. 679.
Decided January 15, 1968.
___ Tenn. ___, 414 S.W.2d 638, reversed. Longstreet Heiskell for appellant. George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767. THE CHIEF JUSTICE would affirm. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455. Page 389 U.S. 578, 579
Search This Case
