UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO., 389 U.S. 49 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO., 389 U.S. 49 (1967) 389 U.S. 49UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF
AMERICA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 271.
Decided October 23, 1967.
Vacated and remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert A. Hammond III and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States.
Herbert A. Bergson, Howard Adler, Jr., Donald L. Hardison and William K. Unverzagt for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the joint suggestion of mootness and motion to vacate, the judgment of the District Court of January 20, 1967, is vacated as moot and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 271.
Decided October 23, 1967.
Vacated and remanded. Solicitor General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert A. Hammond III and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States. Herbert A. Bergson, Howard Adler, Jr., Donald L. Hardison and William K. Unverzagt for appellees. PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the joint suggestion of mootness and motion to vacate, the judgment of the District Court of January 20, 1967, is vacated as moot and the case is remanded for further proceedings. MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 389 U.S. 49, 50
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO., 389 U.S. 49 (1967) 389 U.S. 49 UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK. No. 271.
Decided October 23, 1967.
Vacated and remanded. Solicitor General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert A. Hammond III and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States. Herbert A. Bergson, Howard Adler, Jr., Donald L. Hardison and William K. Unverzagt for appellees. PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the joint suggestion of mootness and motion to vacate, the judgment of the District Court of January 20, 1967, is vacated as moot and the case is remanded for further proceedings. MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 389 U.S. 49, 50
Search This Case
