UNITED STATES v. PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL CO., 389 U.S. 308 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL CO., 389 U.S. 308 (1967) 389 U.S. 308UNITED STATES v. PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL CO.
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
DELAWARE.
No. 26.
Argued December 7, 1967.
Decided December 11, 1967.
246 F. Supp. 917, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Edwin M. Zimmerman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Ralph S. Spritzer, Daniel M. Friedman and Richard A. Posner.
Albert R. Connelly and H. Francis DeLone argued the cause for appellees. With them on the brief were William S. Potter, John W. Barnum and Eugene P. Souther.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL CO., 389 U.S. 308 (1967) 389 U.S. 308 UNITED STATES v. PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL CO. ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
No. 26.
Argued December 7, 1967.
Decided December 11, 1967.
246 F. Supp. 917, affirmed by an equally divided Court. Edwin M. Zimmerman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Ralph S. Spritzer, Daniel M. Friedman and Richard A. Posner. Albert R. Connelly and H. Francis DeLone argued the cause for appellees. With them on the brief were William S. Potter, John W. Barnum and Eugene P. Souther. PER CURIAM. The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware is affirmed by an equally divided Court. MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 389 U.S. 308, 309
