RATNER v. CALIFORNIA, 388 U.S. 442 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
RATNER v. CALIFORNIA, 388 U.S. 442 (1967) 388 U.S. 442RATNER ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF
THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. No. 10.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Certiorari granted; reversed.
Richard A. Lavine for petitioners.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would affirm.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.
U.S. Supreme Court
RATNER v. CALIFORNIA, 388 U.S. 442 (1967) 388 U.S. 442 RATNER ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. No. 10.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Certiorari granted; reversed. Richard A. Lavine for petitioners. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would affirm. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. Page 388 U.S. 442, 443
