CAMODEO v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 575 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
CAMODEO v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 575 (1967) 387 U.S. 575CAMODEO v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1073, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1967.
Certiorari granted; 367 F.2d 146, vacated and remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CAMODEO v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 575 (1967) 387 U.S. 575 CAMODEO v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1073, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1967.
Certiorari granted; 367 F.2d 146, vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. Page 387 U.S. 575, 1
