CEPERO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF PUERTO RICO, 387 U.S. 424 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF PUERTO RICO, 387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424CEPERO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF
PUERTO RICO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO.
No. 1565, Misc.
Decided May 29, 1967.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424 (1967) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL OIL CO., 387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL OIL CO.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
NEW MEXICO.
No. 450.
Decided May 29, 1967.
Vacated and remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky and Lawrence W. Somerville for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico for further consideration in light of United States v. Pabst Brewing Co., 384 U.S. 546.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF PUERTO RICO, 387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424 CEPERO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF PUERTO RICO.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO.
No. 1565, Misc.
Decided May 29, 1967.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424 (1967) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL OIL CO., 387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424 UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL OIL CO.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 450.
Decided May 29, 1967.
Vacated and remanded. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky and Lawrence W. Somerville for the United States. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico for further consideration in light of United States v. Pabst Brewing Co., 384 U.S. 546. Page 387 U.S. 424, 425