BELCHER v. WISCONSIN, 387 U.S. 241 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
BELCHER v. WISCONSIN, 387 U.S. 241 (1967) 387 U.S. 241BELCHER v. WISCONSIN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
WISCONSIN.
No. 24, Misc.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 24, Misc.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. Page 387 U.S. 241, 242
U.S. Supreme Court
BELCHER v. WISCONSIN, 387 U.S. 241 (1967) 387 U.S. 241 BELCHER v. WISCONSIN.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 24, Misc.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. Petitioner pro se. Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. Page 387 U.S. 241, 242
Search This Case
