MASCUILLI, v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 237 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
MASCUILLI, v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 237 (1967) 387 U.S. 237MASCUILLI, ADMINISTRATRIX v. UNITED
STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR
THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 274.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Certiorari granted; 358 F.2d 133, reversed.
Abraham E. Freedman, Milton M. Borowsky and Martin J. Vigderman for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mahnich v. Southern S. S. Co., 321 U.S. 96; Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U.S. 423.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 274.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Certiorari granted; 358 F.2d 133, reversed. Abraham E. Freedman, Milton M. Borowsky and Martin J. Vigderman for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mahnich v. Southern S. S. Co., 321 U.S. 96; Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U.S. 423. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. Page 387 U.S. 237, 238
U.S. Supreme Court
MASCUILLI, v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 237 (1967) 387 U.S. 237 MASCUILLI, ADMINISTRATRIX v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 274.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Certiorari granted; 358 F.2d 133, reversed. Abraham E. Freedman, Milton M. Borowsky and Martin J. Vigderman for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mahnich v. Southern S. S. Co., 321 U.S. 96; Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser, 358 U.S. 423. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. Page 387 U.S. 237, 238
Search This Case
