YOUNG v. DIRECTOR, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, 386 U.S. 546 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
YOUNG v. DIRECTOR, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, 386 U.S. 546 (1967) 386 U.S. 546YOUNG v. DIRECTOR, U.S. BUREAU OF
PRISONS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE
DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1317, Misc.
Decided April 10, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 263, appeal dismissed.
Appellant pro se.
Solicitor General Marshall for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1317, Misc.
Decided April 10, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 263, appeal dismissed. Appellant pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Page 386 U.S. 546, 547
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
YOUNG v. DIRECTOR, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, 386 U.S. 546 (1967) 386 U.S. 546 (1967) 386 U.S. 546 386 U.S. 546"> YOUNG v. DIRECTOR, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1317, Misc.
Decided April 10, 1967.
263 F. Supp. 263, appeal dismissed. Appellant pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Page 386 U.S. 546, 547
Search This Case
