BEER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 11 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BEER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 11 (1967) 386 U.S. 11BEER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 858, Misc.
Decided February 13, 1967.
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
An application for a stay addressed to MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and by him referred to the Court, is denied.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 858, Misc.
Decided February 13, 1967.
Affirmed. PER CURIAM. An application for a stay addressed to MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and by him referred to the Court, is denied. The judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 386 U.S. 11, 12
U.S. Supreme Court Reports
BEER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, 386 U.S. 11 (1967) 386 U.S. 11 (1967) 386 U.S. 11 386 U.S. 11"> BEER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 858, Misc.
Decided February 13, 1967.
Affirmed. PER CURIAM. An application for a stay addressed to MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and by him referred to the Court, is denied. The judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 386 U.S. 11, 12
Search This Case
