ANNBAR ASSOCIATES v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP., 385 U.S. 5 (1966)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

ANNBAR ASSOCIATES v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP., 385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5

ANNBAR ASSOCIATES ET AL. v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 152.
Decided October 10, 1966.

 397 S.W.2d 635, appeal dismissed.

William M. Kufeld for appellants.

Guy W. Rice for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GLICK v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., 385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5

GLICK ET AL. v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 168.
Decided October 10, 1966.

 396 S.W.2d 609, appeal dismissed.

Elwyn L. Cady, Jr., for appellants.

Morris H. Kross, John R. Caslavka, Harry P. Thomson, Jr., and E. E. Thompson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 5, 6

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

ANNBAR ASSOCIATES v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP., 385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5 ANNBAR ASSOCIATES ET AL. v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 152.
Decided October 10, 1966.

 397 S.W.2d 635, appeal dismissed.

William M. Kufeld for appellants.

Guy W. Rice for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GLICK v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., 385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5 GLICK ET AL. v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 168.
Decided October 10, 1966.

 396 S.W.2d 609, appeal dismissed.

Elwyn L. Cady, Jr., for appellants.

Morris H. Kross, John R. Caslavka, Harry P. Thomson, Jr., and E. E. Thompson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 5, 6