NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE
385 U.S. 450 (1967)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE, 385 U.S. 450 (1967)

385 U.S. 450

NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 767.
Decided January 9, 1967.

68 Wash. 2d 72, 415 P.2d 93, appeal dismissed.

Footnotes

[Footnote �] ERRATA: "72" in "68 Wash. 2d 72" should be "721".

Appellant pro se.

A. L. Newbould for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 450, 451


KIRKPATRICK v. PREISLER, <a href="/cases/federal/us/385/450/case.html">385 U.S. 450</a> (1967) 385 U.S. 450 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KIRKPATRICK v. PREISLER, 385 U.S. 450 (1967)

385 U.S. 450

KIRKPATRICK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSOURI, ET AL. v. PREISLER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
MISSOURI. No. 738.
Decided January 9, 1967.

257 F. Supp. 953, affirmed.

Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and J. Gordon Siddens and Thomas J. Downey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Paul W. Preisler, pro se, and for other appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.