WORTHY v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 894 (1966)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
WORTHY v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 894 (1966) 384 U.S. 894WORTHY v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 1107, Misc.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 122 U.S. App. D.C. 242, 352 F.2d 718, vacated and remanded.
David B. Isbell for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 1107, Misc.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 122 U.S. App. D.C. 242, 352 F.2d 718, vacated and remanded. David B. Isbell for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855. Page 384 U.S. 894, 895
U.S. Supreme Court
WORTHY v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 894 (1966) 384 U.S. 894 WORTHY v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 1107, Misc.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Certiorari granted; 122 U.S. App. D.C. 242, 352 F.2d 718, vacated and remanded. David B. Isbell for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855. Page 384 U.S. 894, 895
Search This Case
