TILLMAN v. CITY OF PORT ARTHUR, 384 U.S. 315 (1966)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
TILLMAN v. CITY OF PORT ARTHUR, 384 U.S. 315 (1966) 384 U.S. 315TILLMAN ET AL. v. CITY OF PORT
ARTHUR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 1214.
Decided May 31, 1966.
398 S.W.2d 750, appeal dismissed.
W. J. Durham for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
384 U.S. 315 (1966) 384 U.S. 315 (1966) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ALTON v. TAWES, 384 U.S. 315 (1966) 384 U.S. 315ALTON v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MARYLAND.
No. 1344.
Decided May 31, 1966.
253 F. Supp. 731, affirmed.
Bennett Crain, Jr., and George Cochran Doub for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to advance is granted. The judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 1214.
Decided May 31, 1966.
398 S.W.2d 750, appeal dismissed. W. J. Durham for appellants. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
384 U.S. 315 (1966) 384 U.S. 315 (1966) ">
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 1344.
Decided May 31, 1966.
253 F. Supp. 731, affirmed. Bennett Crain, Jr., and George Cochran Doub for appellant. PER CURIAM. The motion to advance is granted. The judgment is affirmed. Page 384 U.S. 315, 316
U.S. Supreme Court
TILLMAN v. CITY OF PORT ARTHUR, 384 U.S. 315 (1966) 384 U.S. 315 TILLMAN ET AL. v. CITY OF PORT ARTHUR.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 1214.
Decided May 31, 1966.
398 S.W.2d 750, appeal dismissed. W. J. Durham for appellants. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
384 U.S. 315 (1966) 384 U.S. 315 (1966) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ALTON v. TAWES, 384 U.S. 315 (1966) 384 U.S. 315 ALTON v. TAWES, GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.
No. 1344.
Decided May 31, 1966.
253 F. Supp. 731, affirmed. Bennett Crain, Jr., and George Cochran Doub for appellant. PER CURIAM. The motion to advance is granted. The judgment is affirmed. Page 384 U.S. 315, 316
Search This Case
