HOLLINGSHEAD v. WAINWRIGHT, 384 U.S. 31 (1966)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLLINGSHEAD v. WAINWRIGHT, 384 U.S. 31 (1966) 384 U.S. 31HOLLINGSHEAD v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS
DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
FLORIDA.
No. 457, Misc.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.
Petitioner pro se.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 457, Misc.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Certiorari granted; judgment reversed. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied. Page 384 U.S. 31, 32
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLLINGSHEAD v. WAINWRIGHT, 384 U.S. 31 (1966) 384 U.S. 31 HOLLINGSHEAD v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 457, Misc.
Decided April 18, 1966.
Certiorari granted; judgment reversed. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied. Page 384 U.S. 31, 32
Search This Case
