HARRISON v. SCHAEFER, 383 U.S. 269 (1966)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HARRISON v. SCHAEFER, 383 U.S. 269 (1966) 383 U.S. 269HARRISON ET AL. v. SCHAEFER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
WYOMING.
No. 854.
Decided February 28, 1966.
251 F. Supp. 450, affirmed.
Thomas O. Miller for appellants.
A. G. McClintock for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING.
No. 854.
Decided February 28, 1966.
251 F. Supp. 450, affirmed. Thomas O. Miller for appellants. A. G. McClintock for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 383 U.S. 269, 270
U.S. Supreme Court
HARRISON v. SCHAEFER, 383 U.S. 269 (1966) 383 U.S. 269 HARRISON ET AL. v. SCHAEFER ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING.
No. 854.
Decided February 28, 1966.
251 F. Supp. 450, affirmed. Thomas O. Miller for appellants. A. G. McClintock for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 383 U.S. 269, 270
Search This Case