WELLS v. REYNOLDS, 382 U.S. 39 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
WELLS v. REYNOLDS, 382 U.S. 39 (1965) 382 U.S. 39 WELLS ET AL. v. REYNOLDS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 258.
Decided October 18, 1965.
238 F. Supp. 779, affirmed.
Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit III for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS dissent.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHAKESPEARE v. CITY OF PASADENA, 382 U.S. 39 (1965) 382 U.S. 39 SHAKESPEARE ET AL. v. CITY OF PASADENA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 281.
Decided October 18, 1965.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Appellants pro se.
Allyn H. Barber for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
WELLS v. REYNOLDS, 382 U.S. 39 (1965) 382 U.S. 39 WELLS ET AL. v. REYNOLDS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
GEORGIA. No. 258.
Decided October 18, 1965.
238 F. Supp. 779, affirmed.
Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit III for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS dissent.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHAKESPEARE v. CITY OF PASADENA, 382 U.S. 39 (1965) 382 U.S. 39 SHAKESPEARE ET AL. v. CITY OF PASADENA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 281.
Decided October 18, 1965.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Appellants pro se.
Allyn H. Barber for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 382 U.S. 39, 40
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
