TURNEY v. ARKANSAS, 381 U.S. 276 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court
TURNEY v. ARKANSAS, 381 U.S. 276 (1965) 381 U.S. 276TURNEY v. ARKANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS.
No. 967.
Decided May 17, 1965.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 237 Ark. 569, 375 S.W.2d 375.
Thomas J. Gentry for appellant.
Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
381 U.S. 276 (1965) 381 U.S. 276 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
McKINLEY v. REILLY, 381 U.S. 276 (1965) 381 U.S. 276McKINLEY v. REILLY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 1000.
Decided May 17, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 96 Ariz. 176, 393 P.2d 268.
Mark Wilmer for appellant.
Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, Phillip M. Haggerty and Jerry W. Lawson, Assistant Attorneys General, and John E. Madden, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TURNEY v. ARKANSAS, 381 U.S. 276 (1965) 381 U.S. 276 TURNEY v. ARKANSAS.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS.
No. 967.
Decided May 17, 1965.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 Ark. 569, 375 S.W.2d 375. Thomas J. Gentry for appellant. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
381 U.S. 276 (1965) 381 U.S. 276 (1965) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
McKINLEY v. REILLY, 381 U.S. 276 (1965) 381 U.S. 276 McKINLEY v. REILLY ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 1000.
Decided May 17, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 96 Ariz. 176, 393 P.2d 268. Mark Wilmer for appellant. Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, Phillip M. Haggerty and Jerry W. Lawson, Assistant Attorneys General, and John E. Madden, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 381 U.S. 276, 277