ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA, 379 U.S. 4 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA, 379 U.S. 4 (1964) 379 U.S. 4ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 46, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
379 U.S. 4 (1964) 379 U.S. 4 (1964) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 4 (1964) 379 U.S. 4ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED
STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
VERMONT.
No. 131.
Decided October 12, 1964.
227 F. Supp. 815, affirmed.
Bryce Rea, Jr., and Louis Lisman for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; W. G. Burnette for Lynchburg Traffic Bureau; Arthur A. Arsham and John J. C. Martin for National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al.; and John M. Cleary, John F. Donelan and Dickson R. Loos for National Industrial Traffic League, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA, 379 U.S. 4 (1964) 379 U.S. 4 ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA.APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 46, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 379 U.S. 4, 5
379 U.S. 4 (1964) 379 U.S. 4 (1964) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 4 (1964) 379 U.S. 4 ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT.
No. 131.
Decided October 12, 1964.
227 F. Supp. 815, affirmed. Bryce Rea, Jr., and Louis Lisman for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; W. G. Burnette for Lynchburg Traffic Bureau; Arthur A. Arsham and John J. C. Martin for National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al.; and John M. Cleary, John F. Donelan and Dickson R. Loos for National Industrial Traffic League, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
