MOITY v. LOUISIANA, 379 U.S. 201 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
MOITY v. LOUISIANA, 379 U.S. 201 (1964) 379 U.S. 201MOITY v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 337.
Decided December 7, 1964.
245 La. 546, 159 So. 2d 149, reversed.
Bentley G. Byrnes for appellant.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and M. E. Culligan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is reversed. Garrison v. Louisiana, ante, p. 64.
379 U.S. 201 (1964) 379 U.S. 201 (1964) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
MUTTER v. WISCONSIN, 379 U.S. 201 (1964) 379 U.S. 201MUTTER v. WISCONSIN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 495.
Decided December 7, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 23 Wis. 2d 407, 127 N.W.2d 15.
Roger C. Minahan for appellant.
George Thompson, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Roy G. Tulane and Robert D. Martinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MOITY v. LOUISIANA, 379 U.S. 201 (1964) 379 U.S. 201 MOITY v. LOUISIANA.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 337.
Decided December 7, 1964.
245 La. 546, 159 So. 2d 149, reversed. Bentley G. Byrnes for appellant. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and M. E. Culligan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The judgment is reversed. Garrison v. Louisiana, ante, p. 64.
379 U.S. 201 (1964) 379 U.S. 201 (1964) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
MUTTER v. WISCONSIN, 379 U.S. 201 (1964) 379 U.S. 201 MUTTER v. WISCONSIN.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 495.
Decided December 7, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 23 Wis. 2d 407, 127 N.W.2d 15. Roger C. Minahan for appellant. George Thompson, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Roy G. Tulane and Robert D. Martinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 379 U.S. 201, 202