DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD, 379 U.S. 15 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD, 379 U.S. 15 (1964) 379 U.S. 15DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., INC., ET AL.
v. BYRD.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE.
No. 311.
Decided October 19, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: ___ Tenn. App. ___, 376 S.W.2d 745.
W. Neil Thomas, Jr., for appellants.
H. Keith Harber for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
379 U.S. 15 (1964) 379 U.S. 15 (1964) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
BOINEAU v. THORNTON, 379 U.S. 15 (1964) 379 U.S. 15BOINEAU ET AL. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 483.
Decided October 19, 1964.
235 F. Supp. 175, affirmed.
Ralph E. Becker for appellants.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Clarence T. Goolsby, Jr., and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD, 379 U.S. 15 (1964) 379 U.S. 15 DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., INC., ET AL. v. BYRD.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE.
No. 311.
Decided October 19, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: ___ Tenn. App. ___, 376 S.W.2d 745. W. Neil Thomas, Jr., for appellants. H. Keith Harber for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
379 U.S. 15 (1964) 379 U.S. 15 (1964) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
BOINEAU v. THORNTON, 379 U.S. 15 (1964) 379 U.S. 15 BOINEAU ET AL. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 483.
Decided October 19, 1964.
235 F. Supp. 175, affirmed. Ralph E. Becker for appellants. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Clarence T. Goolsby, Jr., and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 379 U.S. 15, 16