NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC R.R. v. INTERSTATE COMM. COMM'N, 379 U.S. 132 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC R.R. v. INTERSTATE COMM. COMM'N, 379 U.S. 132 (1964) 379 U.S. 132NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 381.
Decided November 23, 1964.
228 F. Supp. 690, affirmed.
Randolph Karr for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., and Robert W. Ginnane for the Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; J. Thomason Phelps for Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; Boris H. Lakusta for the City of San Rafael et al.; and Frederick G. Pfrommer for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 381.
Decided November 23, 1964.
228 F. Supp. 690, affirmed. Randolph Karr for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., and Robert W. Ginnane for the Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; J. Thomason Phelps for Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; Boris H. Lakusta for the City of San Rafael et al.; and Frederick G. Pfrommer for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 379 U.S. 132, 133
U.S. Supreme Court
NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC R.R. v. INTERSTATE COMM. COMM'N, 379 U.S. 132 (1964) 379 U.S. 132 NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 381.
Decided November 23, 1964.
228 F. Supp. 690, affirmed. Randolph Karr for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., and Robert W. Ginnane for the Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; J. Thomason Phelps for Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; Boris H. Lakusta for the City of San Rafael et al.; and Frederick G. Pfrommer for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 379 U.S. 132, 133
Search This Case
