GAGER v. KASDON, 379 U.S. 13 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
GAGER v. KASDON, 379 U.S. 13 (1964) 379 U.S. 13GAGER v. KASDON.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 195, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 234 Md. 7, 197 A.2d 837.
Appellant pro se.
Hillel Abrams for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 195, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 234 Md. 7, 197 A.2d 837. Appellant pro se. Hillel Abrams for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 379 U.S. 13, 14
U.S. Supreme Court
GAGER v. KASDON, 379 U.S. 13 (1964) 379 U.S. 13 GAGER v. KASDON.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 195, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 234 Md. 7, 197 A.2d 837. Appellant pro se. Hillel Abrams for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 379 U.S. 13, 14
Search This Case
