PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 586 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 586 (1964) 378 U.S. 586PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 934, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 324 F.2d 689.
Petitioner pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration in light of Fallen v. United States, ante, p. 139.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 934, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 324 F.2d 689. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration in light of Fallen v. United States, ante, p. 139. MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent. Page 378 U.S. 586, 587
U.S. Supreme Court
PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 586 (1964) 378 U.S. 586 PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 934, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 324 F.2d 689. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration in light of Fallen v. United States, ante, p. 139. MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent. Page 378 U.S. 586, 587
Search This Case
