HUDSON COUNTY NEWS CO. v. SILLS, 378 U.S. 583 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HUDSON COUNTY NEWS CO. v. SILLS, 378 U.S. 583 (1964) 378 U.S. 583HUDSON COUNTY NEWS CO., INC., v. SILLS,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 1037.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 41 N. J. 220, 195 A.2d 626.
Julius Kass for appellant.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, Evan William Jahos, Assistant Attorney General, and John W. Hayden, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
Morris B. Abram for Council for Periodical Distributors Associations, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 1037.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 41 N. J. 220, 195 A.2d 626. Julius Kass for appellant. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, Evan William Jahos, Assistant Attorney General, and John W. Hayden, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees. Morris B. Abram for Council for Periodical Distributors Associations, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellant. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 378 U.S. 583, 584
U.S. Supreme Court
HUDSON COUNTY NEWS CO. v. SILLS, 378 U.S. 583 (1964) 378 U.S. 583 HUDSON COUNTY NEWS CO., INC., v. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY,ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 1037.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 41 N. J. 220, 195 A.2d 626. Julius Kass for appellant. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, Evan William Jahos, Assistant Attorney General, and John W. Hayden, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for appellees. Morris B. Abram for Council for Periodical Distributors Associations, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellant. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 378 U.S. 583, 584
Search This Case
