DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK, 378 U.S. 570 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK, 378 U.S. 570 (1964) 378 U.S. 570DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION,
SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 893, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Leon B. Polsky and Edward A. Miller for petitioner.
Isidore Dollinger and Irving Anolik for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
U.S. Supreme Court
DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK, 378 U.S. 570 (1964) 378 U.S. 570 DEL HOYO v. NEW YORK.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 893, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Leon B. Polsky and Edward A. Miller for petitioner. Isidore Dollinger and Irving Anolik for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra. Page 378 U.S. 570, 571
