OISTER v. PENNSYLVANIA, 378 U.S. 568 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
OISTER v. PENNSYLVANIA, 378 U.S. 568 (1964) 378 U.S. 568OISTER v. PENNSYLVANIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 682, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 201 Pa. Super. 251, 191 A.2d 851.
Joseph Knox Fornance for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
U.S. Supreme Court
OISTER v. PENNSYLVANIA, 378 U.S. 568 (1964) 378 U.S. 568 OISTER v. PENNSYLVANIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 682, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 201 Pa. Super. 251, 191 A.2d 851. Joseph Knox Fornance for petitioner. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra. Page 378 U.S. 568, 569
