HARRIS v. VIRGINIA, 378 U.S. 552 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
HARRIS v. VIRGINIA, 378 U.S. 552 (1964) 378 U.S. 552HARRIS ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF
VIRGINIA. No. 57, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Len W. Holt and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners.
Sol Goodman for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244, and Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 57, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Len W. Holt and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners. Sol Goodman for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244, and Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242. Page 378 U.S. 552, 553
U.S. Supreme Court
HARRIS v. VIRGINIA, 378 U.S. 552 (1964) 378 U.S. 552 HARRIS ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 57, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Len W. Holt and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners. Sol Goodman for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244, and Robinson v. Florida, ante, p. 153. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, ante, p. 242. Page 378 U.S. 552, 553
Search This Case
