CURTIS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 128 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CURTIS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 128 (1964) 378 U.S. 128CURTIS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLORADO.
No. 1033.
Decided June 15, 1964.
225 F. Supp. 894, affirmed.
Duane W. Acklie, Donald E. Leonard and Anthony F. Zarlengo for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Thomas F. Kilroy for Denver-Albuquerque Motor Transport, Inc., et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 1033.
Decided June 15, 1964.
225 F. Supp. 894, affirmed. Duane W. Acklie, Donald E. Leonard and Anthony F. Zarlengo for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission. Thomas F. Kilroy for Denver-Albuquerque Motor Transport, Inc., et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 378 U.S. 128, 129
U.S. Supreme Court
CURTIS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 128 (1964) 378 U.S. 128 CURTIS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 1033.
Decided June 15, 1964.
225 F. Supp. 894, affirmed. Duane W. Acklie, Donald E. Leonard and Anthony F. Zarlengo for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission. Thomas F. Kilroy for Denver-Albuquerque Motor Transport, Inc., et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 378 U.S. 128, 129
Search This Case
