ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL, 378 U.S. 127 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL, 378 U.S. 127 (1964) 378 U.S. 127ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
ARIZONA.
No. 553, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554.
W. Edward Morgan for petitioner.
Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, Philip M. Haggerty, Assistant Attorney General, and Norman E. Green for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 553, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554. W. Edward Morgan for petitioner. Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, Philip M. Haggerty, Assistant Attorney General, and Norman E. Green for respondents. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360. Page 378 U.S. 127, 128
U.S. Supreme Court
ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL, 378 U.S. 127 (1964) 378 U.S. 127 ELFBRANDT v. RUSSELL ET AL.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 553, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554. W. Edward Morgan for petitioner. Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, Philip M. Haggerty, Assistant Attorney General, and Norman E. Green for respondents. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360. Page 378 U.S. 127, 128
Search This Case
