HEARNE v. SMYLIE, 377 U.S. 563 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
HEARNE v. SMYLIE , 377 U.S. 563 (1964)377 U.S. 563
Walter R. HEARNE et al.
v.
Robert E. SMYLIE, Governor of Idaho et al.
No. 1075.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 22, 1964
Herman J. McDevitt, for appellants.
Allan G. Shepard, Atty. Gen. of Idaho, and M. Allyn Dingel, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below is reversed. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186; Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds.
Mr. Justice CLARK would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713, 741, 1476.
Mr. Justice STEWART would remand for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in his dissenting opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713, 744, 1477.
Mr. Justice HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his
dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S.
533, 589, 1395.[ Hearne v. Smylie 377 U.S. 563 (1964) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
HEARNE v. SMYLIE , 377 U.S. 563 (1964) 377 U.S. 563 Walter R. HEARNE et al.v.
Robert E. SMYLIE, Governor of Idaho et al.
No. 1075. Supreme Court of the United States June 22, 1964 Herman J. McDevitt, for appellants. Allan G. Shepard, Atty. Gen. of Idaho, and M. Allyn Dingel, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees. PER CURIAM. The judgment below is reversed. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186; Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds. Mr. Justice CLARK would reverse on the grounds stated in his opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713, 741, 1476. Mr. Justice STEWART would remand for further proceedings consistent with the views stated in his dissenting opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U.S. 713, 744, 1477. Mr. Justice HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 589, 1395.[ Hearne v. Smylie 377 U.S. 563 (1964) ]
