AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 514 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 514 (1964) 376 U.S. 514AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 724.
Decided March 23, 1964.
221 F. Supp. 328, affirmed.
Peter T. Beardsley and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and William J. Taylor for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 724.
Decided March 23, 1964.
221 F. Supp. 328, affirmed. Peter T. Beardsley and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and William J. Taylor for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 376 U.S. 514, 515
U.S. Supreme Court
AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 514 (1964) 376 U.S. 514 AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 724.
Decided March 23, 1964.
221 F. Supp. 328, affirmed. Peter T. Beardsley and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and William J. Taylor for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 376 U.S. 514, 515
Search This Case
