FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS v. MORRIS, 376 U.S. 513 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS v. MORRIS, 376 U.S. 513 (1964) 376 U.S. 513FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS, INC., v.
MORRIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 57.
Decided March 23, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 377 P.2d 42.
Howard Ellis, Perry S. Patterson, Don H. Reuben and Thomas A. Diskin for appellant.
C. E. Ram Morrison for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 57.
Decided March 23, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 377 P.2d 42. Howard Ellis, Perry S. Patterson, Don H. Reuben and Thomas A. Diskin for appellant. C. E. Ram Morrison for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted. Page 376 U.S. 513, 514
U.S. Supreme Court
FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS v. MORRIS, 376 U.S. 513 (1964) 376 U.S. 513 FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS, INC., v. MORRIS.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 57.
Decided March 23, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 377 P.2d 42. Howard Ellis, Perry S. Patterson, Don H. Reuben and Thomas A. Diskin for appellant. C. E. Ram Morrison for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted. Page 376 U.S. 513, 514
Search This Case
