KAUKAS v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 375 U.S. 8 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

KAUKAS v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 375 U.S. 8 (1963)

375 U.S. 8

KAUKAS ET UX. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 259.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 Ill. 2d 197, 188 N. E. 2d 700.

Harry G. Fins and Favil David Berns for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy and Sydney R. Drebin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 8, 9


TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/8/case.html">375 U.S. 8</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 8 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY, 375 U.S. 8 (1963)

375 U.S. 8

TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 153.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 311 F.2d 882.

Cecil N. Cook for petitioner.

William Robert Smith for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, it appearing that the State of Texas has passed a statute in connection with controversies of this kind since the petition for a writ of certiorari was filed in this Court. This order is entered without reaching the merits.




U.S. Supreme Court

KAUKAS v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 375 U.S. 8 (1963)

375 U.S. 8

KAUKAS ET UX. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 259.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 Ill. 2d 197, 188 N. E. 2d 700.

Harry G. Fins and Favil David Berns for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy and Sydney R. Drebin for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 8, 9


TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/8/case.html">375 U.S. 8</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 8 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY, 375 U.S. 8 (1963)

375 U.S. 8

TRUNKLINE GAS CO. v. HARDIN COUNTY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 153.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 311 F.2d 882.

Cecil N. Cook for petitioner.

William Robert Smith for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, it appearing that the State of Texas has passed a statute in connection with controversies of this kind since the petition for a writ of certiorari was filed in this Court. This order is entered without reaching the merits.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.