RYAN v. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, 375 U.S. 7 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

RYAN v. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, 375 U.S. 7 (1963) 375 U.S. 7

RYAN v. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, U.S. CONGRESS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 127.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/7/case.html">375 U.S. 7</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 7 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA, 375 U.S. 7 (1963) 375 U.S. 7

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 132.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 190 Kan. 317, 374 P.2d 578.

Kenneth G. Speir, Herbert H. Sizemore and Eugene Gressman for appellant.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and Charles S. Rhyne for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 7, 8

 


U.S. Supreme Court

RYAN v. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, 375 U.S. 7 (1963) 375 U.S. 7

RYAN v. PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, U.S. CONGRESS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 127.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/7/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/375/7/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/375/7/">375 U.S. 7</a></a></a> (1963) 375 U.S. 7 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA, 375 U.S. 7 (1963) 375 U.S. 7

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF WICHITA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 132.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 190 Kan. 317, 374 P.2d 578.

Kenneth G. Speir, Herbert H. Sizemore and Eugene Gressman for appellant.

William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and Charles S. Rhyne for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 7, 8

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.