CANTON CO. v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY, 375 U.S. 58 (1963)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
CANTON CO. v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY, 375 U.S. 58 (1963) 375 U.S. 58CANTON CO. OF BALTIMORE v. COMPTROLLER
OF THE TREASURY, RETAIL
SALES TAX DIVISION, MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 365.
Decided October 28, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 231 Md. 294, 190 A.2d 92.
Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. for appellant.
Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, Robert C. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, and Franklin Goldstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Opinions
SALES TAX DIVISION, MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 365.
Decided October 28, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 231 Md. 294, 190 A.2d 92. Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. for appellant. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, Robert C. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, and Franklin Goldstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 375 U.S. 58, 59
U.S. Supreme Court
CANTON CO. v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY, 375 U.S. 58 (1963) 375 U.S. 58 CANTON CO. OF BALTIMORE v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY, RETAILSALES TAX DIVISION, MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 365.
Decided October 28, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 231 Md. 294, 190 A.2d 92. Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. for appellant. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, Robert C. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, and Franklin Goldstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 375 U.S. 58, 59
Search This Case
