FAUDEL v. IOWA, 375 U.S. 397 (1964)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

FAUDEL v. IOWA, 375 U.S. 397 (1964) 375 U.S. 397

FAUDEL v. IOWA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SCOTT COUNTY, IOWA.
No. 123, Misc.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Evan Hultman, Attorney General of Iowa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/397/case.html">375 U.S. 397</a> (1964) 375 U.S. 397 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, 375 U.S. 397 (1964) 375 U.S. 397

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF
TEXAS. No. 417, Misc.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard Fender, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353; Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487.

Page 375 U.S. 397, 398

 


U.S. Supreme Court

FAUDEL v. IOWA, 375 U.S. 397 (1964) 375 U.S. 397

FAUDEL v. IOWA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SCOTT COUNTY, IOWA.
No. 123, Misc.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Evan Hultman, Attorney General of Iowa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/397/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/375/397/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/375/397/">375 U.S. 397</a></a></a> (1964) 375 U.S. 397 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, 375 U.S. 397 (1964) 375 U.S. 397

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF
TEXAS. No. 417, Misc.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard Fender, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353; Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487.

Page 375 U.S. 397, 398

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.