SCARNATO v. LAVALLEE, 375 U.S. 20 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
SCARNATO v. LAVALLEE, 375 U.S. 20 (1963) 375 U.S. 20SCARNATO v. LAVALLEE, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 8, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
SCARNATO v. LAVALLEE, 375 U.S. 20 (1963) 375 U.S. 20 SCARNATO v. LAVALLEE, WARDEN.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 8, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391. MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied. Page 375 U.S. 20, 21
