DEARHART v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 504 (1963)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
DEARHART v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 504 (1963) 374 U.S. 504DEARHART v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF
VIRGINIA. No. 745, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, and Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concur in the result.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 745, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, and Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concur in the result. Page 374 U.S. 504, 505
U.S. Supreme Court
DEARHART v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 504 (1963) 374 U.S. 504 DEARHART v. VIRGINIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 745, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, and Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concur in the result. Page 374 U.S. 504, 505
Search This Case
