DANIELS v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 500 (1963)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
DANIELS v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 500 (1963) 374 U.S. 500DANIELS ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF
VIRGINIA. No. 485, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Theodore J. St. Antoine for petitioners.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 485, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Theodore J. St. Antoine for petitioners. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248. Page 374 U.S. 500, 501
U.S. Supreme Court
DANIELS v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 500 (1963) 374 U.S. 500 DANIELS ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 485, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Theodore J. St. Antoine for petitioners. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248. Page 374 U.S. 500, 501
Search This Case
