WOOD v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 100 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
WOOD v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 100 (1963) 374 U.S. 100WOOD ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF
VIRGINIA. No. 79.
Decided June 10, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Melvin L. Wulf, Leonard W. Holt, Henry Halvor Jones and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248.
U.S. Supreme Court
WOOD v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 100 (1963) 374 U.S. 100 WOOD ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 79.
Decided June 10, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Melvin L. Wulf, Leonard W. Holt, Henry Halvor Jones and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners. Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S., at 248. Page 374 U.S. 100, 101
