MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND, 373 U.S. 542 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND, 373 U.S. 542 (1963) 373 U.S. 542MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 989.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 187 A.2d 136.
William M. Kunstler for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
373 U.S. 542 (1963) 373 U.S. 542 (1963) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
GONZALEZ v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 373 U.S. 542 (1963) 373 U.S. 542GONZALEZ ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 984.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 27 Ill. 2d 128, 188 N.E.2d 489.
Frederic D. Houghteling, George W. Overton, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for appellants.
John C. Melaniphy, Milton P. Webster, Jr. and Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND, 373 U.S. 542 (1963) 373 U.S. 542 MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 989.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 187 A.2d 136. William M. Kunstler for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 373 U.S. 542, 543
373 U.S. 542 (1963) 373 U.S. 542 (1963) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
GONZALEZ v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 373 U.S. 542 (1963) 373 U.S. 542 GONZALEZ ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 984.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 27 Ill. 2d 128, 188 N.E.2d 489. Frederic D. Houghteling, George W. Overton, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for appellants. John C. Melaniphy, Milton P. Webster, Jr. and Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.