WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 713 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 713 (1963) 372 U.S. 713WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
CALIFORNIA.
No. 534, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
U.S. Supreme Court
WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 713 (1963) 372 U.S. 713 WILLIAMS v. CALIFORNIA ET AL.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 534, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360. Page 372 U.S. 713, 714
