PARKER v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 608 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

PARKER v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 608 (1963)

372 U.S. 608

PARKER v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 516.
Decided April 1, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with instructions to dismiss indictment.

Reported below: 307 F.2d 585.

Francis Heisler for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Ralph S. Spritzer, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon suggestion of the Solicitor General the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

Page 372 U.S. 608, 609




U.S. Supreme Court

PARKER v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 608 (1963)

372 U.S. 608

PARKER v. UNITED STATES.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 516.
Decided April 1, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with instructions to dismiss indictment.

Reported below: 307 F.2d 585.

Francis Heisler for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Ralph S. Spritzer, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon suggestion of the Solicitor General the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

Page 372 U.S. 608, 609

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.