WALKER v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 526 (1963)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
WALKER v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 526 (1963) 372 U.S. 526WALKER v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 657.
Decided March 18, 1963.
208 F. Supp. 388, affirmed.
Henry W. Moursund, Maynard F. Robinson and R. Dean Moorhead for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and George Nokes, Roland Rice, Carl Wright Johnson and Nat L. Hardy for Central Freight Lines Inc. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 657.
Decided March 18, 1963.
208 F. Supp. 388, affirmed. Henry W. Moursund, Maynard F. Robinson and R. Dean Moorhead for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and George Nokes, Roland Rice, Carl Wright Johnson and Nat L. Hardy for Central Freight Lines Inc. et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 372 U.S. 526, 527
U.S. Supreme Court
WALKER v. UNITED STATES, 372 U.S. 526 (1963) 372 U.S. 526 WALKER v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 657.
Decided March 18, 1963.
208 F. Supp. 388, affirmed. Henry W. Moursund, Maynard F. Robinson and R. Dean Moorhead for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and George Nokes, Roland Rice, Carl Wright Johnson and Nat L. Hardy for Central Freight Lines Inc. et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Page 372 U.S. 526, 527
Search This Case
